Auckland Regional Council has a very useful document downloadable as a pdf from their website called 'Stream Classification and Instream Objectives for Auckland’s Urban Streams.' From it I have been able to find specific information on Oakley Creek.
For example, I have learnt that the only fish-life recorded at Oakley creek are the long and short-finned eels (although the long finned are short). There is also a list of very specific plant, mollusc and insect life found, and how many that will need further investigation. If I become familiar with what I might expect along Oakley Creek I will have a better chance at finding and identifying them.
From this research I have also gained knowledge of different canopy types, and riparian zone types. Whether plant-life is native or exotic will be important to identify.
Saturday, 13 August 2011
clarifying mapping focus and direction for visual communication
What I have decided:
-I am going to communicate the change of place through recording found unnatural objects (signs of human activity), plant and animal life, in set locations along Oakley Creek.
-These locations are still yet to be decided (I anticipate changes will be needed once I have visited these sites), but are suggested by map 2 in 'Mapping Oakley Creek,' a previous post. These 18 suggestions are marked according to where I anticipate a change of place (due to change of activity, type of location).
Problems still to solve:
-How will I define the parameters of each 'location'? will it be defined by 10 of my steps along the stream from a certain point? 5? 20?
-How will I map what I find at each location visually? Cross-section? Will this mean collecting measurements of depth, width, etc? Will I record where I find the objects?
-Plant life will be difficult for me to identify, and animal life difficult to find... how do I work around this?
-What type of media do I want to use for final presentation? Is it more suited to analogue or digital methods? Or a different kind of media?
-I am going to communicate the change of place through recording found unnatural objects (signs of human activity), plant and animal life, in set locations along Oakley Creek.
-These locations are still yet to be decided (I anticipate changes will be needed once I have visited these sites), but are suggested by map 2 in 'Mapping Oakley Creek,' a previous post. These 18 suggestions are marked according to where I anticipate a change of place (due to change of activity, type of location).
Problems still to solve:
-How will I define the parameters of each 'location'? will it be defined by 10 of my steps along the stream from a certain point? 5? 20?
-How will I map what I find at each location visually? Cross-section? Will this mean collecting measurements of depth, width, etc? Will I record where I find the objects?
-Plant life will be difficult for me to identify, and animal life difficult to find... how do I work around this?
-What type of media do I want to use for final presentation? Is it more suited to analogue or digital methods? Or a different kind of media?
examples of river maps
Here are a variety of maps or diagrams of rivers I have found useful in thinking about visual presentation.
This map is of Fox River, Illinois. It has symbols which show places to eat, boating areas, and factories. It marks where the water becomes shallow, where islands are, and even includes photos along some stretches (found: http://mappery.com/Ottawa-IL-Illinois-River-Fox-River-Map)
This map is of Fox River, Illinois. It has symbols which show places to eat, boating areas, and factories. It marks where the water becomes shallow, where islands are, and even includes photos along some stretches (found: http://mappery.com/Ottawa-IL-Illinois-River-Fox-River-Map)
The next map is a 'pocket guide to tideway navigation' for rowers along the Thames river (www.thames-rrc.org). It outlines bridges, crossings, and lines to follow when preceding the ebb, against the stream and with the flood (I never knew rowing was so complicated!). It marks out change of the river width according to low and high tides, too. It is an example of specialized information, a picture or idea of the river according to rowers.
key examples (furthering my ideas of visual presentation and processing)
Today I found a very exciting example by Muf architects on their blog: http://mufarchitectureart.blogspot.com/2008/04/date-tuesday-25.html. They have observed and documented a 19th century, condemned spoil pit called the Beckton Alp, in London. Firstly areas of interest were identified, then human activity in each area, signs of human activity (rubbish, etc), animal presence and human presence according to different weather conditions (see images below).
This puts into practice my idea about documenting found objects at certain locations along Oakley creek. I could tell how the creek is used in different places by what was found there (rubbish, insects, plant-life, animal-life, etc). I would have a 'master map' of the chosen locations, and detail each place in section. These sections juxtaposed would build an idea of what it would be like to selectively boat along the river, and would have implications to place. I would communicate the change of place through recording found unnatural objects (signaling human activity), plant and animal life, as I followed Oakley Creek.
This puts into practice my idea about documenting found objects at certain locations along Oakley creek. I could tell how the creek is used in different places by what was found there (rubbish, insects, plant-life, animal-life, etc). I would have a 'master map' of the chosen locations, and detail each place in section. These sections juxtaposed would build an idea of what it would be like to selectively boat along the river, and would have implications to place. I would communicate the change of place through recording found unnatural objects (signaling human activity), plant and animal life, as I followed Oakley Creek.
mapping Oakley Creek
Mapping Oakley Creek turned out to be quite difficult! The Linz website didn't have accurate data, so I had to use a combination of the data I could find and google maps... (see map 1 below). I identified 8 zones which are points of change in the creek's 'story', something I think is manageable. However...
Then I came across the Morphum website, a consultant employed by Metrowater to report on and map Oakley creek more accurately (they found a total of 37 assets were recorded as having incorrect data in the Metrowater GIS records and a further 91 not recorded in the GIS system). I altered my map accordingly (map 2), and discovered more areas of interest, places where the creek runs a different direction for some time, or appears and disappears under the land. I may have to re-examine my points of interest (they currently are at 18), a number I think is too large if I intend to go back at different times. Morphum also mapped 17 restoration opportunities (shown as green areas), and overland flow (dashed lines).
Oakley Creek: my 'site'?
Today I decided to find out more about the creek I used to run along (before I moved flats). I only knew that it as a creek that stretched along the side of the Mt Roskill War Memorial park, and now I know it is Oakley Creek, where it comes from and where it goes.
Oakley Creek has been amid recent debate, due to the proposed Waterview connection. It has an organization called 'Friends of Oakley Creek' which envisions 'Oakley Creek - Te Auaunga and its environs restored and protected as a natural ecosystem incorporating a range of wildlife habitats, indigenous species and recreational amenities for present and future generations' (http://www.oakleycreek.org.nz/aboutus.htm).
It is considered the 'most natural' water-way left in urban Auckland, and has Auckland's only urban waterfall (just near Unitec). This creek definitely seems like it has a story to tell, and I would like to tell it.
Oakley Creek has been amid recent debate, due to the proposed Waterview connection. It has an organization called 'Friends of Oakley Creek' which envisions 'Oakley Creek - Te Auaunga and its environs restored and protected as a natural ecosystem incorporating a range of wildlife habitats, indigenous species and recreational amenities for present and future generations' (http://www.oakleycreek.org.nz/aboutus.htm).
It is considered the 'most natural' water-way left in urban Auckland, and has Auckland's only urban waterfall (just near Unitec). This creek definitely seems like it has a story to tell, and I would like to tell it.
Tuesday, 9 August 2011
a water video-game?
This is a little off on a tangent from where I think I'm heading, but does relate to talking about water and virtual places... a company called Watercasting, which is concerned about education with regards to water, has developed a video game called "Water-Wars,"set in new Mexico. You are given the character of a water-stakeholder, e.g. a farmer, a real estate developer or planner and have actions you play out with a water-limit... you make decisions about water-use, and policy-making in relation to water and then see how different scenarios play out.
http://www.watercasting.com/stream/?category_name=participatory
Definitely makes me think about water and place in a way I never have before. Such a valuable resource that we so take for granted in NZ!
Ephemeral Streams
Ephemeral streams mapped in Upper San Pedro Basin, Southeastern Arizona
Ephemeral streams seem to be well documented, in NZ and in other parts of the world. The Auckland Council website. They are expected to be small streams, either in headwater areas or coastal streams with small catchments. A well-known Auckland ephemeral stream is in McLean Park, near Howick.
I also found on the council website that there are 13 un-nammed throughout the Auckland region. Every stream is monitored, and depending on its type, has certain objectives. Some are classed as being "disturbed," such as Manutewhau Stream.
list of water-type things I could document
soil type
waterflow
salinity
stream edge/overflow area
things found (insects, fish, plants, pollution or rubbish?)
sediment
width of channel
length of stream
temporary streams ("ephemeral stream")
canopy type
temperature
depth
how might two or more of these be documented in relation to each other to talk about that water's story? Could I map, for example, several stream's depths in different rainfall conditions, and what I find there?
Another type of story? Progression/ travel:
Waitemata Harbour -> Orakei Basin -> Omaru Creek -> Taranaki River-> Panmure Basin -> Pakuranga Creek.
A website I found interesting talks about different spatial scales of rivers and streams, the flows between source and mouth (http://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/rivers-and-streams-life-in-flowing-water-16819919). Biological community changes along the length of rivers, due to changes in oxygen level which relates to the speed of water flow, temperature, depth, debris and canopy-type. These factors are all very interrelated, and I'm beginning to think about how to document these (information-collection and visual communication). I'm still not sure what kind of data I will be collecting, but I am sure I want to collect it at certain intervals along a body of water. This way I can communicate the story of a water body and its changes as it travels.
waterflow
salinity
stream edge/overflow area
things found (insects, fish, plants, pollution or rubbish?)
sediment
width of channel
length of stream
temporary streams ("ephemeral stream")
canopy type
temperature
depth
how might two or more of these be documented in relation to each other to talk about that water's story? Could I map, for example, several stream's depths in different rainfall conditions, and what I find there?
Another type of story? Progression/ travel:
Waitemata Harbour -> Orakei Basin -> Omaru Creek -> Taranaki River-> Panmure Basin -> Pakuranga Creek.
A website I found interesting talks about different spatial scales of rivers and streams, the flows between source and mouth (http://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/rivers-and-streams-life-in-flowing-water-16819919). Biological community changes along the length of rivers, due to changes in oxygen level which relates to the speed of water flow, temperature, depth, debris and canopy-type. These factors are all very interrelated, and I'm beginning to think about how to document these (information-collection and visual communication). I'm still not sure what kind of data I will be collecting, but I am sure I want to collect it at certain intervals along a body of water. This way I can communicate the story of a water body and its changes as it travels.
"wading birds"
After exploring many maps cataloguing the Auckland region's water (http://www.aucklandcity.govt.nz/council/documents/awireview/default.asp & http://www.watercare.co.nz/Pages/default.aspx) I came across this map. It shows designated areas for Auckland's "wading birds" - something I never would have thought up! Just beginning to touch on the role water plays in ecology..
a relevant blog
During my research yesterday I came across a blog cataloguing the design projects of AD2 Architecture students in the U.K. They looked into "relational architecture," including a section on water. It was good for inspirational water-diagrams and thinking, definitely recommend a look: http://studiotwo.wordpress.com/category/micronomics-of-water/
thoughts from class 03/08
One thing that struck me today: the way that a powerful, well-known story can totally precede the place name itself.
Think New Orleans and not flooding, the Twin Towers and not terrorism, Chernobyl or Hiroshima without nuclear disaster and (now maybe) Christchurch without earthquake. The event, or story, is what comes to mind first. There is something very powerful about a story, the telling of a place and something that happened there.
How do I tell the story of Auckland's water?
What would a story of water look like?
-where it comes from, what it travels through, how it is treated, where it ends up? how it is used?
Think New Orleans and not flooding, the Twin Towers and not terrorism, Chernobyl or Hiroshima without nuclear disaster and (now maybe) Christchurch without earthquake. The event, or story, is what comes to mind first. There is something very powerful about a story, the telling of a place and something that happened there.
How do I tell the story of Auckland's water?
What would a story of water look like?
-where it comes from, what it travels through, how it is treated, where it ends up? how it is used?
Responses to Reading of the Week - What is Place Anyway?
What are the key characteristics defining "place"?
-To exist is to be in a place
-"Local"/"regional"/unique experiences
-Identity, character, nuance, history
Casey, E. S. (1998) Disappearing places, from The fate of place, a philosophical history. Berkley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, ix-xv
1- Identify some reasons why Casey believes that the idea of place has been hidden in philosophical discourse, both historically and in more recent times. (your should find at least 4).
-Place has been taken for granted, not worthy (we have no choice, by existing we must be in a "place" so we don't think about it
-Place has been subordinated to "putative absolutes" like space and time
-Place became reduced to locations, subject to time and only between our movements
-It does not fall easily under analysis
-Event of wars, refugees, terrorism, etc. undermining our sense of place
-Technology: doesn't matter where you are, you are still connected
2- What does Casey mean by the term universalism? Give an example. Why is this detrimental to place based thinking?
-Universalism: an essence or contagious idea that spreads everywhere, regardless of place or particular attributes to areas/context.
-Treatment of ethics and politics, logic and language the same everywhere
-e.g. Le Corbusier's "Radiant City": a series of identical housing units for many locations around France. Design without any regard for culture or uniqueness of context. Result being "sameness"; imagine buildings being the same everywhere, not knowing India from England!
3- Casey says that disruption to a place, in the aftershock, can bring about "a revitalized sensitivity to place". He gives the possibility of nuclear annihilation as an example. Can you think of some historical examples where this new sensitivity to place might have occurred in this way?
-Christchurch, right now! A new awareness for the original streams that used to flow in the region, a re-thinking of its identity.
-New Orleans. Housing appropriate for environment, a re-design of the city and development of the main park.
4- Casey says that even the 'virtual' can provide elements of a place based experience, and can make us feel 'in place' though physically distant. Think of a virtual experience that you frequently have (online banking / computer gaming / using mobile phone) and analyse it in terms of providing a place based experience.
-Facebook: place-like as you "do" things there, and can see what other people are doing. It is sharing, community, activity and accessibility to information and people, just like in a real place.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)